Assessing equity indicators and anti-displacement governance for urban green spaces as social infrastructure
This study conducts a comparative analysis of two European greening projects—Ekostaden Augustenborg in Malmö, Sweden, and DakPark in Rotterdam, the Netherlands—to evaluate how institutional governance, policy frameworks, and ex-ante equity indicators affect green gentrification. The research finds that Malmö's integration of green-space management with social housing authorities, guided by binding indicators like residential turnover and local employment, maintained community stability, whereas Rotterdam's market-oriented approach resulted in demographic displacement.
Why it matters — It demonstrates that preventing green gentrification requires treating social housing as an intrinsic component of green infrastructure planning, rather than managing ecological regeneration and housing policy in isolation.
Caveat: The findings are based on a comparative analysis of only two European case studies, which may limit their direct applicability to different institutional and housing market contexts.